THE 20 YEAR DEATH CYCLE OF AMERICAN PRESIDENTS

"The high office of President has been used to format a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight." 
John F. Kennedy at Columbia University, 10 days before his assassination. 


HOME


David E McMinn

With one exception since 1840, US presidents who have been elected in years ending in '0' have either been assassinated or have died of natural causes while in office. This 20 year death cycle has been appreciated for many decades. An edition of Ripley's Believe It or Not, published in 1934, noted the coincidental 20 year pattern of presidential deaths between 1840 and 1920, with question marks inserted for the upcoming 1940 entry. This implied that there could be a continuation of the cyclic pattern, which was fulfilled when Franklin Roosevelt was re-elected in 1940 and subsequently died in office in 1945. Based on this 20 year death cycle, several astrologers correctly predicted the death of President John F Kennedy when he was elected in 1960. Similarly, it was expected that President Reagan would also die in office, which almost came to pass with the attempted assassination on March 30, 1981. Even more strangely, two Presidents, who were elected in years ending in ‘0’ -- Lincoln and F D Roosevelt -- both died in their following term after being re-elected in the ‘4’ year. Therefore, the 20 year death cycle anticipated the successful re-election of these presidents to the oval office. George W Bush was elected in 2000 and again in 2004. It will be very interesting to see if the 20 year death cycle is repeated in coming months - this would seem very unlikely. 

Using the Fisher Exact Probability test, the presidential death cycle was shown to yield a significance level of 0.00004, thus confirming that the cycle was very unlikely to occur by chance. A mathematician, Michael Capobianco, applied a more conservative methodology and still produced significance at p < .01.  

The 20 year death cycle appears to be more than just coincidence, especially as only one president since 1840 has died in office and was not elected in a '0' year. The exception was Zachary Taylor, who became president in 1848 and died of a stomach ailment in 1850. The cause of death was suspicious and it was speculated he had been poisoned with arsenic. In 1991, his body was exhumed to investigate this theory, but the findings proved negative. 

President Elected In

Died
1800 Jefferson Survived: Died July 4, 1826.
1820 Monroe Survived: Died July 4, 1831.
1840, Harrison April 4, 1841. Pneumonia
1860, Lincoln April 15, 1865. Assassinated
1880, Garfield July 2, 1881. Assassinated
1900, McKinley September 19, 1901. Assassinated
1920, Harding August 2, 1923. Food poisoning
1940, Roosevelt April 12, 1945. Stroke, medical records missing
1960, Kennedy November 22, 1963. Assassinated
1980, Reagan Survived:  March 30, 1981. Assassination attempt.
Died: June 5, 2004.
2000, Bush ??????


Adding to the mystery,  there have been attempted assassinations on various presidents - Andrew Jackson 1835, F D Roosevelt 1933, Harry Truman 1950, Gerald Ford (two separate attempts in Sept 1975) and Ronald Reagan (1981). (John Taylor survived a shipboard explosion in 1844, but this may have been an accident.) Of these attempted assassinations, only Ronald Reagan was elected in a '0' year compared with four successful murders within the 20 year cycle. Additionally, vice presidents only attained the presidency outside the curse on two occasions  - Millard Fillmore after the death of Zachary Taylor in 1850 and Gerald Ford after the resignation of Richard Nixon in 1973 following the Watergate scandal (William S Connery).

Traditional Astrology

Many astrologers attribute the 20 year death cycle to the timing of Jupiter - Saturn conjunctions, when the angles between these two planets is zero degrees on the ecliptical circle. This is not an exact cycle as the conjunction happens about every 19.8 years, while elections take place every 20 years and the average interval between presidential deaths is about 21 years. According to tradition, Jupiter represents optimism, expansion and the ruler, while Saturn symbolises death, pessimism, and contraction. With the conjunction, these planetary influences of Jupiter (the ruler) and Saturn (death) merge. Since 1800, the conjunction of these two planets happened close to the '0' year of presidential elections, thus giving rise to the cycle of presidential deaths.  This configuration has always taken place in an earth sign (Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn) except in 1820 and 1980, when the conjunction occurred in a fire and an air sign respectively (see Table 1).

Table 1         THE 20 YEAR DEATH CYCLE & JUPITER/SATURN CONJUNCTIONS

President Elected In

Jupiter/Saturn Conjunctions 

Fire Signs Earth Signs Air Signs
1800, Jefferson   July 19, 1802
Virgo 15° 
 
1820, Monroe June 17, 1821
Aries 24°
   
1840, Harrison   January 25,  1842 
Capricorn 8°
 
1860, Lincoln   October 23, 1861
Virgo 18°
 
1880, Garfield   April 16, 1881
Taurus 1°
 
1900, McKinley   November 28, 1901
Capricorn 14°
 
1920, Harding   September 12, 1921
Virgo 27°
 
1940, Roosevelt   August 1, 1940
Taurus 13°
October 27, 1940
Taurus 11°
February 10, 1941
Taurus 8°
 
1960, Kennedy   February 19, 1961
Capricorn 25° 
 
1980, Reagan     January 7, 1981 
Libra 9°
February 10, 1981
Libra 9° 
February 24,  1981
Libra 8°
2000, Bush   May 25, 2000
Taurus 22°
 

In 1940 and 1980, there were three Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions, a situation that can arise at times due to the retrograde motion of the planets when viewed from Earth.
Source: The Curse of The Presidents


When an American president was elected under the influence of a Jupiter/Saturn conjunction in an earth sign then he usually died in office. The only exception was in 1800 with the election of Jefferson, who was blessed with a long life and died in 1826 some 17 years after leaving office. There were two presidents who were elected when the Jupiter/Saturn conjunction occurred in fire and air signs and both completed their terms.

1820  Monroe. Conjunction happened in Aries - a fire sign.

1980  Reagan. Conjunction happened in Libra - an air sign.

In 2000, the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction re-occurred in an earth sign (Taurus), indicating that George W Bush could die in office - assuming the death cycle persists. On the positive side, a Jupiter/Saturn conjunction will not happen around a zero year and in an earth sign for another 600 years.  According to astrology,  2000 should effectively mark the end of the presidential death cycle in US history.

Moon - Sun Cycles

The findings on the 56 year Moon-Sun cycles and financial panics have been presented in papers on this web site. Artifact 20 year sub-cycles appear in the timing of major financial upheavals (Financial Crises & The Number 56). Four US presidents were elected in a 20 year cycle that may be linked to the 56 year panic cycle as follows:

20 YSC S2 56 Yr Sq President Elected
1920 Sq 48 Warren Harding
1940 Sq 12 F D Roosevelt 
1960 Sq 32 John F Kennedy
1980 Sq 52 Ronald Reagan


Additionally, the basic time unit in the 20 year death cycle was the solar year. Thus, presidential deaths were hypothesised to have something to do with Moon - Sun cycles. Amazingly, correlates can be produced to support such a proposition.

Moon - Sun data was timed at noon (Washington DC) on the day of the presidential death and has been presented in Appendix 1. The ecliptical position of the noon Moon may be out by up to about 7 ecliptical degrees, compared with the Moon at the actual time of death. However, this should not distort the findings in any meaningful way. Grover Cleveland served two terms in 1885-89 and 1893-97 and was considered by history to be the 22nd and 24th president However, his Moon - Sun data was only considered once in this Moon-Sun assessment. A Glossary has been provided for those not familiar with the terms used in this section.

Presidential Deaths Of the first 22 presidents, 12 died in June - July (Sun sited between 70 &127 degrees on the ecliptical circle), which is much higher than the expected frequency of roughly 3.7 assuming and even distribution of deaths over the whole. Even more strangely, three of the first 5 presidents died on July 4 (Independence Day), with two on the same day - July 4, 1826 (John Adams & Thomas Jefferson). The propensity of June-July deaths for early US presidents could be less significant than would first appear, as one would assume that 19th century seasonal death rates had two peaks - one in winter (infectious diseases) and the other in summer (food poisoning and extreme heat events). Even if June - July deaths were 50% higher than for the average two month period in the 19th century, it would still give acceptable significance at p < .01. Additionally, a seasonal effect did not show up for those presidential candidates, who never won an election and who won at least 20 electoral votes. Why early presidents were much more likely to die in June - July remains unknown.

When the first 24 presidents died, 21 had the Moon sited on the ecliptic at between 90 & 295 degrees or a segment of 205 degrees. This compared with the expected frequency of 13.7 (significant p < .01). 

Of the first 24 presidents, the first (George Washington) died in December 1799 and the last (Grover Cleveland) in June 1908, a time period that approximates to 6 nutation cycles of 18.6 years each. Some 17 presidents had the lunar north node sited between 120 & 275 ecliptical degrees, a segment of 155 degrees. In contrast, the expected death frequency was 9.9 (significant p < .01).

When the first 23 presidents died, 17 had Moon - Sun angles (lunar phase) between 205 to 005 angular degrees, a range of 160 degrees. This is in contrast to the expected frequency of 10.2 (significant p < .01).

High  significance could only be produced for about the first 22 to 24 presidents. Significance is weakened or eliminated by using the full sample of 36 presidents who have died to date. This seems most peculiar and cannot be accounted for.

Presidential Births.
Of the first 22 presidents, only one (John Quincy Adams) was born in the 5 month period May to September, which again seemed most unusual (significant p < .001 assuming an even distribution of births over the solar year).

No significance (p > .01) could be established for the ecliptical placement of the Moon or lunar north node at the time of US presidential births. A similar situation applied to lunar phase.

Although good correlates may be produced for the earlier presidential deaths, it does not clarify how Moon - Sun cycles could possibly influence the longevity of US presidents or cause presidents to die in office every 20 years. This cannot be explained within scientific paradigms nor within cycles of human mass psychology that influence financial trends (The Moon, The Sun & The Number 56). Clearly more research is necessary in this area, as it remains very puzzlingly. 

Native American Prophecies

There are intriguing stories of an old Indian hex on the American nation, so that every 20 years the 'great chief' dies in office (William S Connery).  This curse has been attributed to Tecumseh, a charismatic leader who tried to unite all the native American tribes in the mid west to protect their lands against the predations of the white race.  Unfortunately, Tecumseh's plan collapsed following the Battle of Tippecanoe in 1811, which marked the turning point  in native American resistance. Following this battle, Tecumseh is supposed to have released prisoners,  with a prophetic message for the leader of the US troops, General William Henry Harrison. "Harrison will die in his office….. I who caused the Sun to darken and Red Men to give up firewater tell you Harrison will die. And after him, every Great Chief chosen every 20 years thereafter will die. And when each one dies, let everyone remember the death of our people."   

Another variation of the story (there are several) was that the curse was pronounced by Tenskwatawa, a Shawnee medicine man also known as "The Prophet". His curse was his revenge for the death of his half brother Tecumsah, who died in the 1813 Battle of The Thames fighting against US troops again led by Harrison. "Harrison will die I tell you", Tenskwatawa said "And after him, every Great Chief chosen every 20 years thereafter will die. And when each one dies, let everyone remember the death of my people." 

This makes a great story, but there is only one quandary - there is no firm historical evidence that either Tecumseh or Tenskwatawa actually uttered those words. There is also the problem as to why presidents should be cursed to die every 20 years rather than some other time frame. Someone probably concocted this story during the 20th century to add a certain of mystery to the presidential death cycle. The fact that this curse was never documented in early US history castes doubt on its validity.

Coincidences Between The Lincoln & Kennedy Assassinations

The similarities between the Lincoln and Kennedy assassinations have been appreciated for decades and have been well recorded. In fact, such speculations first emerged shortly after the shooting of Kennedy in 1963 and were published in the Readers Digest in 1982. These parallels have been outlined as follows.

The Presidents were first elected to Congress 100 years apart (Lincoln in 1846 & Kennedy in 1946).
They were runner-up for vice president 100 years apart (Lincoln in 1856 & Kennedy in 1956).
They were elected president 100 years apart (Lincoln in 1860 & Kennedy 1960).

Both presidents served in the military. Lincoln in the Black Hawk War and Kennedy in World War II. Both were boat captains. Lincoln was captain of the Talisman, a Mississippi river boat, and Kennedy was captain of PT 109.

Lincoln had sons named Robert and Edward. Kennedy had brothers named Robert and Edward.

Both presidents were killed by a bullet that entered the head from behind.

Both presidents were assassinated on a Friday prior to a holiday. Lincoln was shot on Good Friday while Kennedy was shot on the Friday before Thanksgiving.

Each wife had lost a son while living at the White House.

Both were seated next to their wives when shot, neither of the wives were injured. 

Both were in the company of someone else who was injured, but not fatally. Major Rathbone was slashed with a knife and Governor Connally was shot.

Lincoln was killed in Ford's Theater. Kennedy was killed in a Lincoln
convertible manufactured by the Ford Motor Company.

Both the presidents were deeply involved in civil rights for African Americans. Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation went into effect in 1863, while Kennedy's report to Congress on Civil Rights was sent in 1963.

Assassins. Both assassins were Southerners who held extremist views and were murdered before they could be brought to trial. 

Booth shot Lincoln in a theatre and fled to a barn. Lee Harvey Oswald shot 
Kennedy from a warehouse and fled to a theatre (ie: the reverse order of events). 

Both assassins were privates in the military. Booth in the Virginia militia and Oswald in the Marines.

Both assassins were killed by a single shot from a Colt revolver.

Vice Presidents. Both presidents were succeeded by vice-presidents named Johnson, who
were Southern Democrats and former Senators. 

Andrew Johnson was born in 1808, while Lyndon Johnson was born 100 years later in 1908.

Both successors chose not to run for re-election in '68. 

Taken separately, these historical curiosities may be readily dismissed as coincidental and due to a biased selection of the facts (Barbara & David P Mikkelson; Bruce Martin). However, compiling them all together does make one wonder if there is more than 'coincidence' in the similarities between the assassinations of presidents Lincoln & Kennedy. Another problem arises in explaining why the interval of 100 years was so important in comparing the lives of these two presidents. Unfortunately, no comments can be offered to clarify these enigmas.  

A Rose By Any Other Name Would Smell As Sweet

Unfortunately this does not hold if you are a US presidential candidate. Since the election of president Garfield in 1880, US presidents have a strong propensity to have the first letters of their surname and first name in close alphabetical proximity. The most obvious examples being Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Dwight Eisenhower, Gerald Ford, Ronald Regan, Bill Clinton and so forth. In fact most presidents had an alphabetical interval of 6 letters or less in their initials (see Table 2). The four exceptions were all elected pre 1950 - William McKinley (9), Warren Harding (14), Franklin Roosevelt (11) and Harry Truman (11).

Initial Interval Number of US Presidents
1880 - 2008
=>15 None
7-14 4
4-6 4
0-3 13


Prior to 1880, this name effect did not hold with most presidents having an alphabetical separation between their first/surname initials of 5 or more letters (only two exceptions - James Madison and James Monroe). Some of the USA's greatest presidents (eg: George Washington (15) and Abraham Lincoln (10)) possibly would not be successful, had they stood for office in modern times. If American parents want to enhance their son's prospect of becoming president, it would be far better to name him/her something like Ronald Reagan than Bruce Reagan or Bill Clinton instead of Wayne Clinton.

The propensity for elected leaders to have initials in close alphabetical proximity also applies to Australian prime ministers following federation in 1900. After 1940, there have been 13 prime ministers, of which only two had an initial interval of 7 or more letters in the alphabet (see Appendix 2). They were William McMahan (9) and Gough Whitlam (15), both held the position for only a few years. Before 1940, the effect did not show up, as there were 11 prime ministers and only 5 had an initial interval of 6 letters or less which could be expected by chance. Curiously, since 1900, only one Australian prime minister had an initial interval of 16 or more letters and that was Chris Watson (19) who led the country for less than four months. 

Initial Interval Number of Aust PMs
post 1900
=>16 1
11-15 3
7-10 4
0-6 16

 

Similarly, Canadian prime ministers were also more likely to have a small initial interval between their first and surnames. The effect was more pronounced after mid 1920 for whatever reason.

Initial Interval Number of Canadian PMs
mid 1920 to 2007
Initial Interval Number of Canadian PMs 
1867 to 2007
    => 17 None
=>12 None 12-16 2
8-11 6 (a) 8-11 11 (a)
0-7 8 (a) 0-7 09 (a)

(a) There are two possible names for Canada's current prime minister - Steven Harper and 'Joe' Harper, which have initial intervals of 10 and 1 respectively. The former has been used in this table. Either way it does not change the findings. 


This propensity for small initial intervals also applied to New Zealand premiers and prime ministers especially after the era between April 1912 and 2007.

Initial Interval Number of NZ PMs
post April 1912
Initial Interval Number of NZ Premiers/PMs 
post 1856
    => 17 None
=>11 None 11-16 8
6-10 11 6-10 14
0-5 11 0-5 18


British prime ministers
also tended to have initials in close alphabetical proximity between 1902 and 2007, but the emphasis was less pronounced than for other English speaking democracies. The notable exceptions were Stanley Baldwin (initial interval 16), Winston Churchill (19) and Tony Blair (17), all of whom were popular long serving leaders.

Initial Interval

Number of British PMs
1902 - 2007

16-19

3

11-15 1
7-10 3
0-6 13


Unfortunately no data was available on initial intervals for the general population, so a valid comparison could not be made. These findings for elected leaders may just be an artifact of people having a preference to give their children names with initials in close alphabetical proximity. This has yet to be examined.

Alphabetism. People with the first letter of their surname near the beginning of the alphabet will always appear near the beginning of any alphabetical listing. This gives them a big advantage over people with surname initials in the latter half of the alphabet. There are many subtle forms of discrimination due to alphabetism, several examples of which were given by The Economist (editorial, Sept 1, 2001). A teacher may arrange the classroom alphabetically to allow them to better remember student names. Students with the first letter of their surname at the beginning of the alphabet will appear at the front of the class, which would allow better teacher - student interaction and resultant better academic outcomes. At university graduation ceremonies, the A, B & Cs get their awards first, but by the time people with family names beginning X, Y or Z get their awards, the audience is bored and looking at the exists. Problems also arise in  job interviews arranged alphabetically - the first candidates will always make a better impression than the last ones as the interviewers find the process increasingly tiresome. At academic and business conferences, speakers and attendees can be listed alphabetically so that the greatest attention will be given to those near the top of the listings. Joint academic papers may have their authors listed alphabetically so that people with A, B, C beginning surnames will gain the greatest credit. The bias also arises in voting  where candidates are listed alphabetically on the ballot. The candidates at the beginning will tend to receive more votes than the ones at the end due to the 'donkey vote'. Thus, the discrimination against the alphabetically challenged persists throughout life, with severe ramifications to the sufferers' self esteem, feelings of self worth and potential for success in life. Alphabetism shows up strongly in the success of politicians. 

From 1900 to 2007, there were 24 Australian prime ministers, of which 19 had surname initials in the first half of the alphabet. Amazingly since 1940, there have been 13 prime ministers with surname initials in the first half of the alphabet and only one in the latter half  - Gough Whitlam. Of the 30 cabinet members in the Howard federal government in mid 2006, 11 had a surname initial of A, B or C, compared with 7 in the latter half of the alphabet. 

Of the 42 US presidents 2005, 31 had the surname initial in the first half of the alphabet and 9 with an A, B or C. The same effect shows up for failed presidential hopefuls. Of the 38 presidential candidates, who never won a presidential election and who won at least 20 electoral votes, 27 had a surname initial in the first half of the alphabet with 11 candidates having B & C initials. 

Of the 21 British Prime Ministers between 1900 and 2007, 9 had surnames beginning with the first three letters of the alphabet and only two with surnames beginning with the last 13 letters of the alphabet. In 2006, there were 23 members of the British cabinet, of which 9 have a surname initial of A or B.

There have been 16 Canadian prime ministers between 1900 and 2007, of which 12 had a surname initial between A & M and five had the initials B & C. 

The impact of aphabetism does not show up in New Zealand politics. This country had 23 prime ministers between 1900 and 2007, with 16 having the their surname initial in the first half of the alphabet (roughly 12 could be expected by chance) and there was no notable emphasis on the first few letters of the alphabet.

Middle Name Emphasis. An Australian entertainment mogul, Harry M Millar, was asked why he inserted an M in his name and he responded "Who would remember Harry Millar?" The insertion of a middle name or initial emphasises the whole name. Thus, assassins of American presidents are usually denoted with a middle name or initial. Lee Oswald sounds rather innocuous, where as Lee Harvey Oswald gives a completely different emphasis (sinister?). Similarly with John Booth rather than John Wilkes Booth.

President Assassin
Abraham Lincoln John Wilkes Booth
James Garfield Charles J Guiteau
William McKinley Leon F Czolgosz
John Kennedy Lee Harvey Oswald


Double Lettering. Since 1890, a US presidential candidate was much more likely to be successful if he had a name with double letters - the many examples have been highlighted in Table 2. This effect has been appreciated since the 1960's and probably earlier. Famous presidents with double letters were Roosevelt, Hoover, Coolidge, Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton  and so forth (James Donahue). Only four Republican or Democratic presidential candidates had double lettering in their name and failed to win at least one stint in the White House (see Appendix 3). These were William Bryan, Wendell Willkie, Barry Goldwater and John Kerry. As for Wendell Willkie, would you be predisposed to vote for a man with such a name? Besides, he was pitted against Franklin Roosevelt in 1940, who was also blessed with double lettering. Similarly, William Bryan stood against candidates with double lettering in each of the three elections he participated in - 1896 (William McKinley), 1900 (William McKinley) and 1908 (William Taft). Barry Goldwater was unsuccessful in the 1964 elections, even though he could have been expected to win against Lyndon Johnson given his strong name advantage. However, Goldwater had limited electoral appeal as he was from the far right and this was the liberal 1960’s. John Kerry was the only other candidate who failed to win a presidential election (2004), despite having double lettering in his name and initials in close alphabetical proximity. This was the reverse situation applying to Barry Goldwater. The 2000's was the era of the right wing christian conservative and Kerry was a liberal from the northern states. Even so, Bush's win was not decisive (Bush 51% & Kerry 48%) and there was serious vote cheating that benefited the conservative side (Robert Kennedy Jnr). Kerry may have actually won the election as expected from the double lettering effect, but lost through Republican vote rigging. In any third world country there would have been outrage at such blatant manipulation of the system, but it was very acceptable in George Bush's America. Strangely, the double lettering effect does not apply to Anglo speaking countries with Westminster systems of government - UK, Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Few prime ministers in these countries have had double letters in their names.

George Wallace (1964 election) and Ross Perot (1992 & 1996 elections) had a crucial double letter name advantage, but could never have been expected to win as they were the 'third' candidate. 

US voters seem to prefer candidates with double letters and initial letters in close alphabetical proximity. Such letterings may promote feelings of trust, authority, familiarity or whatever. Why these name effects in electing US presidents only emerged after 1880's may possibly be due to:

*     the growth of the mass media, which increasingly invaded voters lives. 

*    improved literacy levels amongst the population.

The name effects for US presidents and Australian prime ministers could easily arise from data mining, especially given the small sample size involved. Even so, it is reasonable to hypothesise that the presidential candidate's name does influence the outcome of an election. Some names just sound better than others, thus making the candidate more appealing thus giving a crucial winning edge. Name effects are most obvious in the success Hollywood movie stars of the mid 20th century. Would Cary Grant have become so famous if he had remained Archibald Leach? Cary Grant gives the impression of glamour, something an Archie Leach could never achieve. Many other examples may be given as follows.

Doris Day Doris von Kappelhoff
Robert Taylor Spangler Arlington Brugh
June Allyson Ella Geisman
Cyd Charisse Tula Ellice Finklea
Lauren Bacall Betty Perske
Danny Kaye David Kaminsky
Kirk Douglas Issur Demsky
Michael Caine Maurice Micklewhite

 

Table 2         US PRESIDENTS WITH DOUBLE LETTERING         

President Elected

Initial Interval (a) Born

Died

George Washington 15 February 22, 1732 December 14, 1799
John Adams 8 October 30, 1735 July 4, 1826
Thomas Jefferson 9 April 13, 1743 July 4, 1826
James Madison 2 March 16, 1751 June 28, 1836
James Monroe 2 April 28, 1758 July 4, 1831
John Quincy Adams 8 July 11, 1767 February 23, 1848
Andrew Jackson 8 March 15, 1767 June 8, 1845
Martin van Buren 8 for Van
10 for Buren
December 5, 1782 July 24, 1862
William Henry Harrison 14 February  9, 1773 April 4 1841
John Tyler 9 March 29, 1790 January 18, 1862
James Knox Polk 5 November 2, 1795 June 15, 1849
Zachary Taylor 5 November 24, 1784 July 9, 1850
Millard Fillmore 6 January 7, 1800 March 8, 1874
Franklin Pierce 9 November 23, 1804 October 8, 1869
James Buchanan 7 April 23, 1791 June 1, 1868
Abraham Lincoln 10 February 12, 1809 April 15, 1865
Andrew Johnson 8 December 29, 1808 July 31, 1875
Ulysses Simpson Grant 13 April 27, 1822 July 23, 1885
Rutherford Birchard Hayes 9 October 4, 1822 January 17, 1893
James Abram Garfield 2 November 19, 1831 September 19, 1881
Chester Alan Arthur 1 October 5, 1829 November 18, 1886
Grover Cleveland 3 March 18, 1837 June 24, 1908
Benjamin Harrison 5 August 20, 1833 March 13, 1901
William McKinley 9 January 29, 1843 September 14, 1901
Theodore Roosevelt 1 October 27, 1858 January 6, 1919
William Howard Taft 2 September 15, 1857 March 8, 1930
Woodrow Wilson 0 December 28, 1856 February 3, 1924
Warren G Harding 14 November 2, 1865 August 2, 1923
Calvin Coolidge 0 July 4, 1872 January 5, 1933
Herbert  C Hoover 0 August 10, 1874 October 20, 1964
Franklin Delano Roosevelt 11 January 30, 1882 April 12, 1945
Harry S Truman 11 May 8, 1884 December 26, 1972
Dwight David Eisenhower 0 October 14, 1890 March 28, 1969
John Fitzgerald Kennedy 0 May 29, 1917 November 22, 1963
Lyndon Johnson 1 August 27, 1908 January 22, 1973
Richard M Nixon 3 January 9, 1913 April 22, 1994
Gerald Ford 0 July 14, 1913  
Jimmy Carter 6 October 1, 1924   
Ronald Reagan 0 February 6, 1911 June 5, 2004  
George Herbert Walker Bush 4 June 12, 1924   
Bill Clinton 0 August 19, 1946     
George Walker Bush 4 July 6, 1946  
Names with double letters have been presented in Bold.
(a) This gives the number of letters between the first letter of the surname and christian names. 


Conclusions


Skeptics deride the 20 year death cycle as coincidental, even though only one president since 1840 has completed his term in office and was elected in a '0' year. Coincidence is a distinct possibility, but this is the usual response most researchers adopt when they cannot clarify anomalous findings. All to often 'coincidence' can dismiss vital avenues for further study. Astrologers have also attempted to explain the death cycle in terms of Jupiter - Saturn cycles, which are at best unproven and at worst dubious. Additionally, good correlates can be produced between Moon-Sun cycles and 19th century US presidential deaths, but this does not explain how these luminaries could possibly influence the longevity of US leaders.  The prospect of a old Indian curse may be dismissed outright. It make a great story, but there is no historical evidence to support the claim. 

No option really solves the problem and the 20 year death cycle remains an intriguing mystery. The ultimate test will come with George W and whether he survives his second term in office, as he was elected in 2000 - another '0' year with a Jupiter/Saturn conjunction in an earth sign. As with all predictions only time will tell...........  

Copyright. © 2003-07. David McMinn. All rights reserved.