|
THE
20 YEAR DEATH CYCLE OF AMERICAN PRESIDENTS
"The high office of President has been used to format a plot to destroy the American's
freedom and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight."
John F. Kennedy at Columbia University, 10 days before his
assassination.
HOME
David E McMinn
With
one exception since 1840, US presidents who have been elected
in years ending in '0' have either been assassinated or have died of
natural causes while in office. This 20 year death cycle has been appreciated for many decades. An edition of Ripley's
Believe It or Not, published in 1934, noted the coincidental 20 year
pattern of presidential deaths between 1840 and 1920, with question
marks inserted for the upcoming 1940 entry. This implied that there
could be a continuation of the cyclic pattern, which was
fulfilled when Franklin Roosevelt was re-elected in 1940 and
subsequently died in
office in 1945. Based on this 20 year death cycle, several astrologers
correctly predicted the death of President John F Kennedy when he was
elected in 1960. Similarly, it was expected that President Reagan would
also die in office, which almost came to pass with the attempted
assassination on March 30, 1981. Even
more strangely, two Presidents, who were elected in years ending in
‘0’ -- Lincoln and F D Roosevelt -- both died in their following term
after being re-elected in the ‘4’ year. Therefore, the 20 year death
cycle anticipated the successful re-election of these presidents to the
oval office. George W Bush was elected in 2000 and again
in 2004. It will be very interesting to see if the 20 year death cycle
is repeated in coming months - this would seem very unlikely.
Using the Fisher Exact Probability test, the presidential death cycle
was shown to yield a significance level of 0.00004, thus confirming that the cycle
was very unlikely to occur by chance. A mathematician, Michael Capobianco,
applied a more conservative methodology and still produced significance
at p < .01.
The
20 year death cycle appears to be more than just coincidence, especially as only one
president
since 1840 has died in office and was not elected in a '0' year. The
exception was Zachary Taylor, who became president in 1848 and died of a
stomach ailment in 1850. The cause of death was suspicious and it was
speculated he had been poisoned with arsenic. In 1991, his body was
exhumed to investigate this theory, but the findings proved negative.
|
President Elected
In
|
Died |
| 1800
Jefferson |
Survived:
Died July 4, 1826. |
| 1820
Monroe |
Survived:
Died July 4, 1831. |
|
1840, Harrison |
April
4, 1841.
Pneumonia |
|
1860, Lincoln |
April
15, 1865.
Assassinated |
|
1880, Garfield |
July 2, 1881.
Assassinated |
|
1900, McKinley |
September
19, 1901.
Assassinated |
|
1920, Harding |
August
2, 1923. Food poisoning |
|
1940, Roosevelt |
April 12,
1945. Stroke, medical records missing |
|
1960, Kennedy |
November 22, 1963.
Assassinated |
|
1980, Reagan |
Survived:
March 30, 1981.
Assassination attempt.
Died: June 5, 2004. |
| 2000, Bush |
?????? |
Adding to the mystery, there have been attempted assassinations on
various presidents - Andrew Jackson 1835, F D Roosevelt 1933, Harry Truman
1950, Gerald Ford (two separate attempts in Sept 1975) and Ronald Reagan
(1981). (John Taylor survived a shipboard explosion in 1844, but
this may have been an accident.) Of these attempted assassinations, only
Ronald Reagan was elected in a '0' year compared with four successful
murders within the 20 year cycle. Additionally, vice presidents only attained the presidency outside the curse
on two occasions
- Millard Fillmore after the death of Zachary Taylor in 1850 and Gerald
Ford after the resignation of Richard Nixon in 1973 following the
Watergate scandal (William
S Connery).
Traditional Astrology
Many
astrologers
attribute the 20 year death cycle to the timing of Jupiter - Saturn conjunctions,
when the angles between these two planets is zero degrees on the ecliptical circle. This is not an exact cycle as the conjunction happens
about every 19.8 years, while elections take place every 20 years and the
average interval between presidential deaths is about 21 years.
According to tradition, Jupiter represents optimism, expansion and the
ruler, while Saturn symbolises death, pessimism, and contraction. With the
conjunction, these planetary influences of Jupiter (the ruler) and Saturn
(death) merge. Since 1800, the conjunction of
these two planets happened close to the '0' year of presidential elections, thus
giving rise to the cycle of presidential deaths. This configuration
has always taken place in
an earth sign (Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn) except in 1820 and 1980, when the conjunction
occurred in a fire and an air sign respectively (see Table 1).
|
Table
1 THE 20 YEAR
DEATH CYCLE & JUPITER/SATURN CONJUNCTIONS
|
|
President Elected
In
|
Jupiter/Saturn
Conjunctions
|
| Fire
Signs |
Earth
Signs |
Air
Signs |
| 1800,
Jefferson |
|
July
19, 1802
Virgo 15°
|
|
| 1820,
Monroe |
June
17, 1821
Aries 24°
|
|
|
|
1840, Harrison |
|
January
25, 1842
Capricorn 8°
|
|
|
1860, Lincoln |
|
October
23, 1861
Virgo 18°
|
|
|
1880, Garfield |
|
April
16, 1881
Taurus 1°
|
|
|
1900, McKinley |
|
November
28, 1901
Capricorn 14°
|
|
|
1920, Harding |
|
September
12, 1921
Virgo 27°
|
|
|
1940, Roosevelt |
|
August
1, 1940
Taurus 13°
October 27, 1940
Taurus 11°
February 10, 1941
Taurus 8°
|
|
|
1960, Kennedy |
|
February
19, 1961
Capricorn 25°
|
|
|
1980, Reagan |
|
|
January
7, 1981
Libra 9°
February 10, 1981
Libra 9°
February 24, 1981
Libra 8°
|
| 2000, Bush |
|
May 25, 2000
Taurus 22°
|
|
|
In 1940 and 1980,
there were three Jupiter/Saturn conjunctions, a situation that can arise
at times due to
the retrograde motion of the planets when viewed from Earth.
Source: The
Curse of The Presidents |
When an American president was elected under the
influence of a Jupiter/Saturn conjunction in an earth sign then he
usually died
in office. The only exception was in 1800 with the
election of Jefferson, who was blessed with a long life and died in 1826 some 17 years after leaving
office. There were two presidents who were elected when the
Jupiter/Saturn conjunction occurred in fire and air signs and both
completed their terms.
1820 Monroe. Conjunction happened in Aries - a fire sign.
1980 Reagan.
Conjunction happened in Libra - an air sign.
In
2000, the Jupiter-Saturn conjunction re-occurred in an earth sign
(Taurus), indicating that George W Bush could die in office - assuming the death cycle persists. On the positive side, a Jupiter/Saturn conjunction will not
happen around a zero year and in an earth sign for another 600
years. According to astrology, 2000 should effectively mark the end of the
presidential death cycle in US history.
Moon -
Sun Cycles
The findings on the 56 year Moon-Sun cycles and financial panics
have been presented in papers on this web site. Artifact 20 year sub-cycles appear
in the timing of major financial upheavals (Financial
Crises & The Number 56). Four US presidents were elected in a 20 year cycle that may be
linked to the 56 year panic cycle as follows:
| 20
YSC S2 |
56
Yr Sq |
President
Elected |
| 1920 |
Sq 48 |
Warren Harding |
| 1940 |
Sq 12 |
F D Roosevelt |
| 1960 |
Sq 32 |
John F Kennedy |
| 1980 |
Sq 52 |
Ronald Reagan |
Additionally, the basic time unit in the 20 year death cycle was the solar year. Thus,
presidential deaths were hypothesised to have something
to do with Moon - Sun cycles. Amazingly, correlates can be produced to support
such a proposition.
Moon - Sun data was timed at noon (Washington DC) on the day of the
presidential death
and has been
presented in Appendix 1. The ecliptical position of the noon Moon may be out by up to about 7 ecliptical
degrees, compared with the Moon at the actual time of death. However,
this should not distort the findings in any meaningful way. Grover
Cleveland served two terms in 1885-89 and 1893-97 and was considered by
history to be the
22nd and 24th president However, his Moon - Sun data was only considered once in
this Moon-Sun assessment. A Glossary
has been provided for those not familiar with the terms used in this
section.
Presidential Deaths Of the first 22 presidents, 12
died in June - July (Sun sited between 70 &127 degrees on the
ecliptical circle), which is much higher than the expected frequency of
roughly 3.7 assuming and even distribution of deaths over the whole. Even more strangely, three of the first 5 presidents died on
July 4 (Independence Day), with two on the same day - July 4, 1826 (John Adams &
Thomas Jefferson). The propensity of June-July deaths for
early US presidents could be less significant than would first appear, as one would assume that 19th century seasonal death
rates had two peaks - one in winter (infectious diseases) and
the other in summer (food poisoning and extreme heat events). Even
if June - July deaths were 50% higher than for the average two month
period in the 19th century, it would still give acceptable significance
at p < .01. Additionally, a seasonal effect did not show up for those
presidential candidates, who never won an election and who won at least
20 electoral votes. Why early presidents were much more likely to die in
June - July remains unknown.
When the
first 24 presidents died, 21 had the Moon sited on the ecliptic at between
90 & 295 degrees or a segment of 205 degrees. This compared with the
expected frequency of 13.7 (significant p < .01).
Of the first 24 presidents, the first (George Washington) died in
December 1799 and the last (Grover Cleveland) in June 1908, a time
period that approximates to 6 nutation cycles of 18.6 years each. Some
17 presidents had the lunar north node sited between 120 & 275
ecliptical degrees, a segment of 155 degrees. In contrast, the expected
death frequency was 9.9 (significant p < .01).
When the
first 23 presidents died, 17 had Moon - Sun angles
(lunar phase) between 205 to 005 angular degrees, a range of 160 degrees. This is in contrast to the expected frequency of
10.2 (significant p < .01).
High
significance could only be produced for about the first 22 to 24 presidents.
Significance is weakened or eliminated by using the full sample of 36
presidents who have died to date. This seems most peculiar and cannot be
accounted for.
Presidential Births. Of the first 22 presidents, only one (John Quincy
Adams) was born in the 5 month period May to September, which again seemed
most unusual (significant p < .001 assuming an even distribution of
births over the solar year).
No
significance (p > .01) could be established for the ecliptical
placement of the Moon or lunar north node at the time of US presidential
births. A similar situation applied to lunar phase.
Although good correlates may be produced for the earlier presidential
deaths, it does not clarify how Moon
- Sun cycles could possibly influence the longevity of US presidents or
cause presidents to die in office every 20 years.
This cannot be explained within scientific paradigms nor within cycles of human mass psychology
that influence financial trends (The
Moon, The Sun & The Number 56). Clearly more research is
necessary in this area, as it remains very puzzlingly.
Native American Prophecies
There are intriguing stories of an old Indian hex on the American nation, so that every 20 years the
'great chief' dies in office (William
S Connery).
This curse has been attributed to Tecumseh, a charismatic leader who
tried to unite all the native American tribes in the mid west to protect their lands against the predations of
the white race. Unfortunately, Tecumseh's plan collapsed following
the Battle of Tippecanoe in 1811, which marked the turning point
in native American resistance. Following this battle, Tecumseh is
supposed to have released prisoners,
with a prophetic message for the leader of the US troops, General William Henry Harrison. "Harrison
will die in his office….. I who caused the Sun to darken and Red Men to give up firewater tell you Harrison will die. And after him, every Great Chief chosen every 20 years thereafter will die. And when each one dies, let everyone remember the death of our people."
Another variation of the story (there are several) was that the curse was pronounced by
Tenskwatawa,
a Shawnee medicine man also known as "The Prophet". His curse was his revenge for the death of his half brother
Tecumsah, who died in the 1813
Battle of The Thames fighting against US troops again led by Harrison. "Harrison will die I tell you",
Tenskwatawa said "And after him, every Great Chief chosen every 20 years thereafter will die. And when each one dies, let everyone remember the death of my people."
This
makes a great story, but there is only one quandary - there is no firm
historical evidence that either Tecumseh or Tenskwatawa actually uttered those words.
There is also the problem as to why presidents should be cursed to die every
20 years rather than some other time frame. Someone probably concocted this story during the 20th century to add
a certain of mystery to the presidential death cycle. The fact that this curse was never documented
in early US history castes doubt on its validity.
Coincidences
Between The Lincoln & Kennedy Assassinations
The similarities between the Lincoln and Kennedy assassinations have been
appreciated for decades and have been well recorded. In fact, such speculations first emerged shortly
after the
shooting of Kennedy in 1963 and were published in the Readers Digest in
1982. These parallels have been outlined as
follows.
The Presidents
were first elected to Congress 100 years apart (Lincoln in
1846 & Kennedy
in 1946).
They were runner-up for vice president 100 years apart (Lincoln in 1856
& Kennedy in 1956).
They were elected president 100 years apart (Lincoln in 1860 &
Kennedy 1960).
Both
presidents served in the military.
Lincoln in the Black Hawk War and Kennedy in World War II.
Both were boat captains. Lincoln was captain of the Talisman, a Mississippi river boat, and Kennedy was captain of PT 109.
Lincoln had sons named Robert and Edward. Kennedy had brothers named Robert and Edward.
Both
presidents were killed by a bullet that entered the head from
behind.
Both presidents were assassinated on a Friday prior to a holiday. Lincoln was shot on Good Friday
while Kennedy was shot on the Friday before Thanksgiving.
Each wife had lost a son while living at the White House.
Both were seated next to their wives when shot, neither of the wives were injured.
Both were in the company of someone else who was injured, but not fatally. Major Rathbone was slashed with a knife and Governor Connally was shot.
Lincoln was killed in Ford's Theater. Kennedy was killed in a Lincoln
convertible manufactured by the Ford Motor Company.
Both the presidents were deeply involved in civil rights for African
Americans.
Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation went into effect in 1863, while Kennedy's report to Congress on Civil Rights was sent in 1963.
Assassins.
Both assassins were Southerners who held extremist views and were murdered before they could be brought to trial.
Booth shot Lincoln in a theatre and fled to a barn. Lee Harvey Oswald
shot
Kennedy from a warehouse and fled to a theatre (ie: the reverse order of
events).
Both assassins were privates in the military. Booth in the Virginia militia and Oswald in the Marines.
Both assassins were killed by a single shot from a Colt revolver.
Vice Presidents. Both presidents were succeeded by vice-presidents named Johnson, who
were Southern Democrats and former Senators.
Andrew Johnson was born in 1808, while Lyndon Johnson was born 100 years
later in 1908.
Both successors chose not to run for re-election in '68.
Taken
separately, these
historical curiosities may be readily dismissed as coincidental and
due to a biased selection of the facts (Barbara
& David P Mikkelson; Bruce
Martin). However, compiling them all together does
make one wonder if there is more than 'coincidence' in the similarities
between the assassinations of presidents Lincoln & Kennedy. Another problem arises in explaining
why the interval of 100 years was so important in comparing the lives of
these two presidents. Unfortunately, no comments can be offered to clarify
these enigmas.
|
A
Rose By Any Other Name Would Smell As Sweet
Unfortunately this does not
hold if you are a US presidential candidate. Since the election
of president Garfield in 1880, US presidents have a strong
propensity to have the first letters of their surname and first name in close alphabetical proximity. The most obvious
examples being Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge,
Herbert Hoover, Dwight Eisenhower, Gerald
Ford, Ronald Regan, Bill Clinton
and so forth. In fact most presidents had an alphabetical
interval of 6 letters or less in their initials (see Table 2).
The four exceptions were all elected pre 1950 - William
McKinley (9), Warren
Harding (14), Franklin Roosevelt (11) and Harry
Truman (11).
| Initial
Interval |
Number
of US Presidents
1880 - 2008 |
| =>15 |
None |
| 7-14 |
4 |
| 4-6 |
4 |
| 0-3 |
13 |
Prior
to 1880, this name effect did not hold with most presidents
having an alphabetical separation between their first/surname
initials of 5 or more letters (only two exceptions - James
Madison and James Monroe). Some of the USA's greatest presidents
(eg: George Washington (15) and Abraham Lincoln (10))
possibly would not be successful, had they stood for office in
modern times. If American parents want to enhance their
son's prospect of becoming president, it would be far better to
name him/her something like Ronald Reagan than Bruce Reagan or Bill
Clinton instead of Wayne Clinton.
The
propensity for elected leaders to have initials in close
alphabetical proximity also applies to Australian prime
ministers following federation in 1900. After 1940, there have
been 13 prime ministers, of which only two had an initial
interval of 7 or more letters in the alphabet (see Appendix 2).
They were William McMahan (9) and Gough Whitlam (15), both
held the position for only a few years. Before 1940, the effect
did not show up, as there were 11 prime ministers and only 5 had
an initial interval of 6 letters or less which could be expected
by chance. Curiously, since 1900, only one Australian prime
minister had an initial interval of 16 or more letters and that
was Chris Watson (19) who led the country for less than four
months.
| Initial
Interval |
Number
of Aust PMs
post 1900 |
| =>16 |
1 |
| 11-15 |
3 |
| 7-10 |
4 |
| 0-6 |
16 |
Similarly,
Canadian prime ministers were also more
likely to have a small initial interval between their first and
surnames. The effect was more pronounced after mid 1920 for
whatever reason.
| Initial
Interval |
Number
of Canadian PMs
mid 1920 to 2007 |
Initial
Interval |
Number
of Canadian PMs
1867 to 2007 |
| |
|
=> 17 |
None |
| =>12 |
None |
12-16 |
2 |
| 8-11 |
6
(a) |
8-11 |
11
(a) |
| 0-7 |
8
(a) |
0-7 |
09
(a) |
|
(a) There are two
possible names for Canada's current prime minister -
Steven Harper and 'Joe' Harper, which have initial
intervals of 10 and 1 respectively. The former has been
used in this table. Either way it does not change the
findings. |
This propensity for small initial intervals also applied to New
Zealand premiers and prime ministers especially after the
era between April 1912 and 2007.
| Initial
Interval |
Number
of NZ PMs
post April 1912 |
Initial
Interval |
Number
of NZ Premiers/PMs
post 1856 |
| |
|
=> 17 |
None |
| =>11 |
None |
11-16 |
8 |
| 6-10 |
11 |
6-10 |
14 |
| 0-5 |
11 |
0-5 |
18 |
British prime ministers
also tended to have initials in
close alphabetical proximity between 1902 and 2007, but the emphasis was
less pronounced than for other English speaking democracies. The
notable exceptions were Stanley Baldwin (initial interval 16), Winston Churchill (19) and Tony Blair
(17), all of whom were popular long serving leaders.
|
Initial Interval |
Number of
British PMs
1902 - 2007 |
| 16-19 |
3 |
| 11-15 |
1 |
| 7-10 |
3 |
| 0-6 |
13 |
Unfortunately no data was available on initial intervals for the
general population, so a valid comparison could not be made.
These findings for elected leaders may just be an artifact of
people having a preference to give their children names with
initials in close alphabetical proximity. This has yet to be
examined.
Alphabetism. People
with the first letter of their surname near the beginning of the
alphabet will always appear near the beginning of any alphabetical
listing. This gives them a big advantage over people with
surname initials in the latter half of the alphabet. There
are many subtle forms of discrimination due to alphabetism,
several examples of which were given by The
Economist (editorial, Sept 1, 2001). A
teacher may arrange the classroom alphabetically to allow them
to better remember student names. Students with the first letter
of their surname at the beginning of the alphabet will appear at
the front of the class, which would allow better teacher -
student interaction and resultant better academic outcomes. At
university graduation ceremonies, the A, B & Cs get their
awards first, but by the time people with family names beginning
X, Y or Z get their awards, the audience is bored and looking at
the exists. Problems also arise in job interviews arranged
alphabetically - the first candidates will always make a better
impression than the last ones as the interviewers find the
process increasingly tiresome. At academic and business
conferences, speakers and attendees can be listed
alphabetically so that the greatest attention will be given to
those near the top of the listings. Joint academic papers may
have their authors listed alphabetically so that people with A,
B, C beginning surnames will gain the greatest credit. The bias
also arises in voting where candidates are listed
alphabetically on the ballot. The candidates at the beginning
will tend to receive more votes than the ones at the end due to
the 'donkey vote'. Thus, the discrimination against the
alphabetically challenged persists throughout life, with severe
ramifications to the sufferers' self esteem, feelings of self
worth and potential for success in life. Alphabetism shows
up strongly in the success of politicians.
From 1900 to 2007, there were 24 Australian prime
ministers, of which 19 had surname initials in the first half of
the alphabet. Amazingly since 1940, there have been 13 prime
ministers with surname initials in the first half of the
alphabet and only one in the latter half - Gough Whitlam.
Of the 30 cabinet members in the Howard federal government in
mid 2006, 11 had a
surname initial of A, B or C, compared with 7 in the latter half
of the alphabet.
Of the 42 US presidents 2005, 31 had the surname initial
in the first half of the alphabet and 9 with an A, B or C. The
same effect shows up for failed presidential hopefuls. Of the 38
presidential candidates, who never won a presidential election
and who won at least 20 electoral votes, 27 had a surname
initial in the first half of the alphabet with 11
candidates having B & C initials.
Of
the 21 British Prime Ministers between 1900 and 2007, 9 had
surnames beginning with the first three letters of the alphabet
and only two with surnames beginning with the last 13 letters of
the alphabet. In 2006, there were 23 members of the British cabinet, of
which 9 have a surname initial of A or B.
There have been 16 Canadian prime ministers between 1900 and
2007, of which
12 had a surname initial between A & M and five had the
initials B & C.
The impact of aphabetism does not show up in New
Zealand politics. This country had 23 prime ministers between
1900 and 2007, with 16 having the their surname initial in the first half
of the alphabet (roughly 12 could be expected by chance) and
there was no notable emphasis on the first few letters of the
alphabet.
Middle Name Emphasis. An Australian entertainment mogul,
Harry M Millar, was asked why he inserted an M in his name and
he responded "Who would remember Harry Millar?" The
insertion of a middle name or initial emphasises the whole name.
Thus, assassins of American presidents are usually denoted with a
middle name or initial. Lee Oswald sounds rather innocuous,
where as Lee Harvey Oswald gives a completely different emphasis
(sinister?). Similarly with John Booth rather than John Wilkes
Booth.
| President |
Assassin |
| Abraham
Lincoln |
John Wilkes
Booth |
| James Garfield |
Charles J
Guiteau |
| William
McKinley |
Leon F
Czolgosz |
| John Kennedy |
Lee Harvey
Oswald |
Double Lettering. Since 1890,
a US presidential candidate was much more likely to be
successful if he had a name with double letters - the many
examples have been highlighted in Table 2. This effect has been
appreciated since the 1960's and probably earlier. Famous
presidents with double letters were Roosevelt, Hoover,
Coolidge, Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton
and so forth (James
Donahue). Only four Republican or Democratic presidential candidates
had double lettering in their name and failed to win at least
one stint in the White House (see Appendix
3). These were William
Bryan, Wendell Willkie, Barry
Goldwater and John Kerry. As for Wendell
Willkie, would you be predisposed to vote for a man with such a name?
Besides, he was pitted against Franklin Roosevelt
in 1940, who was also blessed with double lettering. Similarly,
William Bryan stood
against candidates with double lettering in each of the three
elections he participated in - 1896 (William
McKinley), 1900 (William
McKinley) and 1908 (William
Taft). Barry Goldwater was unsuccessful in the 1964 elections, even though he
could have been expected to win against Lyndon Johnson given his
strong name advantage. However, Goldwater had limited
electoral appeal as he was from the far right and this was the
liberal 1960’s. John Kerry was the only other
candidate who failed to win a presidential election (2004),
despite having double lettering in his name and initials in
close alphabetical proximity. This was the reverse situation
applying to Barry Goldwater. The 2000's was the era of
the right wing christian conservative and Kerry was a liberal
from the northern states. Even so, Bush's win was not
decisive (Bush 51% & Kerry 48%) and there was serious vote
cheating that benefited the conservative side (Robert
Kennedy Jnr). Kerry may have actually won the
election as expected from the double lettering effect, but lost
through Republican vote rigging. In any third world country
there would have been outrage at such blatant manipulation of
the system, but it was very acceptable in George Bush's America.
Strangely,
the double lettering effect does not apply to Anglo speaking
countries with Westminster systems of government - UK, Canada,
New Zealand and Australia. Few prime ministers in these
countries have had double letters in their names.
George Wallace (1964 election) and Ross Perot
(1992 & 1996 elections) had a crucial double letter name
advantage, but could never have been expected to win as they
were the 'third' candidate.
US voters seem to prefer candidates with double letters and
initial letters in close alphabetical proximity. Such letterings
may promote feelings of trust, authority, familiarity or
whatever. Why these name effects in electing US presidents only
emerged after 1880's may possibly be due to:
* the growth of the mass media, which
increasingly invaded voters lives.
* improved literacy levels amongst the
population.
The
name effects for US presidents and Australian prime ministers could easily arise from data
mining, especially given the small sample size involved. Even
so, it is reasonable to hypothesise that the presidential
candidate's name does influence the outcome of an election. Some
names just sound better than others, thus making the candidate
more appealing thus giving a crucial winning edge. Name effects
are most obvious in the success Hollywood movie stars of the mid
20th century. Would
Cary Grant have become so famous if he had remained Archibald
Leach? Cary Grant gives the impression of glamour, something an
Archie Leach could never achieve. Many other examples may be
given as follows.
| Doris Day |
Doris von Kappelhoff |
| Robert Taylor |
Spangler Arlington
Brugh |
| June Allyson |
Ella Geisman |
| Cyd Charisse |
Tula Ellice Finklea |
| Lauren Bacall |
Betty Perske |
| Danny Kaye |
David Kaminsky |
| Kirk Douglas |
Issur Demsky |
| Michael Caine |
Maurice Micklewhite |
|
Table
2 US
PRESIDENTS WITH DOUBLE LETTERING
|
|
President
Elected
|
Initial Interval (a) |
Born |
Died
|
| George
Washington |
15 |
February
22, 1732 |
December
14, 1799 |
| John
Adams |
8 |
October
30, 1735 |
July
4, 1826 |
| Thomas
Jefferson |
9 |
April
13, 1743 |
July
4, 1826 |
| James
Madison |
2 |
March
16, 1751 |
June
28, 1836 |
| James
Monroe |
2 |
April
28, 1758 |
July
4, 1831 |
| John
Quincy Adams |
8 |
July
11, 1767 |
February
23, 1848 |
| Andrew
Jackson |
8 |
March
15, 1767 |
June
8, 1845 |
| Martin
van Buren |
8
for Van
10 for Buren |
December
5, 1782 |
July
24, 1862 |
| William
Henry Harrison |
14 |
February
9, 1773 |
April
4 1841 |
| John
Tyler |
9 |
March
29, 1790 |
January
18, 1862 |
| James
Knox Polk |
5 |
November
2, 1795 |
June
15, 1849 |
| Zachary
Taylor |
5 |
November
24, 1784 |
July
9, 1850 |
| Millard
Fillmore |
6 |
January
7, 1800 |
March
8, 1874 |
| Franklin
Pierce |
9 |
November
23, 1804 |
October
8, 1869 |
| James
Buchanan |
7 |
April
23, 1791 |
June
1, 1868 |
| Abraham
Lincoln |
10 |
February
12, 1809 |
April
15, 1865 |
| Andrew
Johnson |
8 |
December
29, 1808 |
July
31, 1875 |
| Ulysses
Simpson Grant |
13 |
April
27, 1822 |
July
23, 1885 |
| Rutherford
Birchard Hayes |
9 |
October
4, 1822 |
January
17, 1893 |
| James
Abram Garfield |
2 |
November
19, 1831 |
September
19, 1881 |
| Chester
Alan Arthur |
1 |
October
5, 1829 |
November
18, 1886 |
| Grover
Cleveland |
3 |
March
18, 1837 |
June
24, 1908 |
| Benjamin
Harrison |
5 |
August
20, 1833 |
March
13, 1901 |
| William
McKinley |
9 |
January
29, 1843 |
September
14, 1901 |
| Theodore
Roosevelt |
1 |
October
27, 1858 |
January
6, 1919 |
| William
Howard Taft |
2 |
September
15, 1857 |
March
8, 1930 |
| Woodrow
Wilson |
0 |
December
28, 1856 |
February
3, 1924 |
| Warren
G Harding |
14 |
November
2, 1865 |
August
2, 1923 |
| Calvin
Coolidge |
0 |
July
4, 1872 |
January
5, 1933 |
| Herbert
C Hoover |
0 |
August
10, 1874 |
October
20, 1964 |
| Franklin
Delano Roosevelt |
11 |
January
30, 1882 |
April
12, 1945 |
| Harry
S Truman |
11 |
May
8, 1884 |
December
26, 1972 |
| Dwight
David Eisenhower |
0 |
October
14, 1890 |
March
28, 1969 |
| John
Fitzgerald Kennedy |
0 |
May
29, 1917 |
November
22, 1963 |
| Lyndon
Johnson |
1 |
August
27, 1908 |
January
22, 1973 |
| Richard M
Nixon |
3 |
January
9, 1913 |
April
22, 1994 |
| Gerald
Ford |
0 |
July
14, 1913 |
|
| Jimmy
Carter |
6 |
October
1, 1924 |
|
| Ronald
Reagan |
0 |
February
6, 1911 |
June
5, 2004 |
| George
Herbert Walker Bush |
4 |
June
12, 1924 |
|
| Bill
Clinton |
0 |
August
19, 1946 |
|
| George
Walker Bush |
4 |
July
6, 1946 |
|
Names
with double letters have been presented in Bold.
(a) This gives the number of letters between the
first letter of the surname and christian names. |
|
Conclusions
Skeptics deride the 20 year death cycle as coincidental, even though only one
president since 1840
has completed his term in office and was elected in a '0' year. Coincidence is a
distinct possibility, but this is the usual response most researchers
adopt when
they cannot clarify anomalous findings. All to often 'coincidence' can
dismiss vital avenues for further study. Astrologers have
also attempted
to explain the death cycle in terms of Jupiter - Saturn cycles, which are at best unproven and at
worst dubious. Additionally, good correlates can be produced between
Moon-Sun cycles and 19th century US presidential deaths, but this does not explain
how these luminaries could possibly influence the longevity of US
leaders. The prospect of a old Indian curse may be dismissed
outright. It make a great story, but there is no historical
evidence to support the claim.
No option really solves the problem
and the 20 year death cycle remains an intriguing mystery.
The ultimate test will come with George W and whether he survives his
second term in office, as he was elected in 2000 - another '0' year with a
Jupiter/Saturn conjunction in an earth sign. As with all predictions only
time will tell...........
Copyright.
© 2003-07.
David McMinn. All rights reserved.
|