|
THE BENNER CYCLE, THE FIBONACCIS & THE NUMBER 56
David McMinn
MOON - SUN FINANCE
Samuel Benner, a prosperous farmer, was wiped out
financially by the 1873 panic and a hog cholera epidemic. In retirement,
he set about to establish the causes and timing of
fluctuations in the economy. In 1875, he published business and commodity price forecasts for the
period 1876 to 1904 (see Diagram 1). In his book, charts
were produced giving;
*
an 11 year cycle in corn and pig prices with peaks alternating
every 5 and 6 years.
*
cotton prices which moved in a cycle with peaks every 11 years.
*
a 27 year cycle in pig iron prices with lows every 11, 9, 7 years
and peaks in the order 8, 9, 10
years.
E R Dewey, Director of the Foundation for the Study
of Cycles, assessed Benner's pig iron price forecasts over a 60 year
period. Remarkably, he regarded this cycle as showing a gain - loss
ratio of 45 to 1, which was “the
most notable forecast of prices in existence”.
Benner's
pig iron price cycle may be broken down into three series, all of which
were based on 9 years and its regular deviations (see Diagram 1).
Those
years listed by Kindleberger (Appendix B, 1996) as containing major
financial crises have been presented in BOLD throughout the text.
Diagram
1
THE
ORIGINAL BENNER CYCLE CHART AS PUBLISHED IN 1875.
The
54 Year Panic Cycle arises from
panics every 16, 18, 20 years, with this series repeating every 54 years
(see upper line Diagram 1). According to Benner, “it
takes panics 54 years in their order to make a revolution or to return
to the same order”. The key years were 1819, 1837, 1857,
1873 which were all found in the 36 ysc
Series 1 of the 9/56 year cycle (see Table A, Appendix
1).
Pig Iron Price
Highs of
good years took place every 8, 9, 10 years (middle line Diagram 1)
repeating every 27 years. The high years were 1810, 1818,
1827, 1837, 1845, 1854, 1864,
1872, 1881, 1891
Pig
Iron Price Cycle Lows of his business cycle occurred or every 11, 9,
7 years (bottom line Diagram 1) repeating every 27 years. The low years
were 1816, 1823, 1834, 1843, 1850, 1861, 1870, 1877, 1888.
Benner's
cycle worked well throughout the 20th century and was a very
good indicator of US crises and/or recessions (McMinn, 2004). The links between
Benner's
cycle and the 9/56 year panic cycle have been covered extensively by
McMinn (2004) and thus will not be discussed in this paper.
Alas,
Benner's cycle is surrounded by some confusion. Either Benner is not
given credit as the originator of the cycle or his name is misspelt -
Banner and Brenner are two variations given by some sources.
A
J Frost's Adaptation
A J Frost
presented a variation on Benner's theory (Prechter &
Frost, 1978). This gave peaks in the US stock
market occurring every 8-9-10 years and two additional 54 year cycles
of historic DJIA lows based on cycles of 16 -18 -20 years. Most importantly, Diagram 2 is not an
extrapolation of Benner's earlier work into the 20th century, but rather
was based on his time cycles of 8-9-10 years and 16-18-20 years. These
cycles were aligned with observed chronological trends.
Diagram
2 THE BENNER - FIBONACCI CYCLE CHART 1902
- 1987
The
54 year Cycle in Table 1 may be strongly linked to
financial trends, as only the year 1995 did not
align with a DJIA bear market low. Importantly, the years 1903, 1921,
1941, 1957, 1975, 1995 all happen within the combined 36 ysc Series 3 & 4 (see Table 6.2, McMinn
2004). Taking this series
and adding one year gives 1904,
1922, 1942, 1958, 1976, 1996 - all of which occurred in the 9/56 year cycles as
presented in Table B, Appendix 1. The only
year in Table 1 that cannot be linked to a bear market low was1995.
| Table
1 THE 54 YEAR CYCLE LOWS COMMENCING IN
1903 |
| Add |
A
J Frost |
US
Event |
DJIA
Bear Market Low |
| |
1903 |
1903-04
Crises |
11/1903 |
| + 18 |
1921 |
1920-21
Panic |
7/1921 |
| + 20 |
1941 |
1942
WW II |
4/1942 -
4 Months Late |
| + 16 |
1957 |
Recession |
10/1957 |
| + 18 |
1975 |
1973-75
Crises |
12/1974
- 1 Month Early |
| + 20 |
1995 |
No
Event |
No
Major Low |
Table
2 gives the second 54 year cycle of major trough years - 1913, 1933,
1949, 1967, 1987, 2003 - only the latter year did not fall in the
9/56 year cycle (see Table B,
Appendix 1).
| Table
2 THE 54 YEAR CYCLE LOWS COMMENCING IN 1913 |
| Add |
A
J Frost |
56
Yr Sq
36 ysc S1 |
US Event |
DJIA
Bear Market Low |
| |
1913 |
Sq
41 |
1913-14
Crises |
7/1914
- 6 Months Late |
| +
20 |
1933 |
Sq
05 |
Great Depression |
7/1932
- 6 Months Early |
| +
16 |
1949 |
Sq
21 |
Recession |
6/1949 |
| +
18 |
1967 |
|
1966
Crisis |
10/1966
- 3 Months Early |
| +
20 |
1987 |
Sq
01 |
Black Monday |
12/1987 |
| +
16 |
2003 |
|
After
Greenspan Bubble |
10/2002
- 3 Months Early |
The
16-18-20 year cycle in Tables 1 & 2 are artifacts of 9/56 year
patterns presented in Table B, Appendix 1
and Table 6.2 McMinn (2004). Many such artifact
sub-cycles can be generated from the 9/56 year cycle (Section 2.4 & Chapter
6, McMinn, 2004).
8-9-10
Year Cycle of DJIA Highs
Diagram
2 by A J Frost also gives the 8-9-10 year trends in DJIA highs since 1902. There is a consistent
pattern for peaks in the DJIA to take place every 8-9-10 years in
line with Benner's findings. This cycle has persisted throughout
the 20th century, with great accuracy. Only 1964 and 1983 were markedly out in the timing of major highs.
For 1964, the secular peak occurred somewhat later in February 1966, whereas
the November 1983 record peak marked the beginning of a DJIA correction
market.
|
Table
3 THE 8-9-10 YEAR CYCLE OF DJIA MARKET HIGHS
|
|
Add
|
A J Frost
|
Major DJIA High
|
DJIA Bear Market |
| |
1902 |
June 17,
1901*
7 months early |
6/1901 -
11/1903 |
| + 8 |
1910 |
November 19,
1909
2 months early |
11/1909
- 9/1911 |
| + 9 |
1919 |
November 3, 1919* |
11/1919 - 8/1921 |
| + 10 |
1929 |
September 3, 1929* |
9/1929 - 7/1932 |
| + 8 |
1937 |
March 10,
1937 |
3/1937 - 3/1938 |
| + 9 |
1946 |
May
29, 1946 |
5/1946
- 6/1949 |
| + 10 |
1956 |
April 6, 1956* |
4/1956 -
10/1957 |
| + 8 |
1964 |
February
9, 1966*
14 months late |
2/1966
- 10/1966 |
| + 9 |
1973 |
January 11, 1973* |
1/1973 - 12/1974 |
| + 10 |
1983 |
No
High (a) |
No
DJIA Bear Market |
| + 8 |
1991 |
July 16,
1990*
6 months early |
7/1990 - 10/1990 |
| + 9 |
2000 |
January 14, 2000* |
1/2000 - ???? |
| + 10 |
2010 |
High ???? |
Bear
Market ???? |
|
(a) 11/1983 marked
a record high and the beginning of a 14.89% correction market
that persisted until 7/1984. |
11-10-7 Year Cycle of DJIA Lows ????
The
11-9-7 year cycle of market troughs was not mentioned in A J Frost's
assessment on market cycles, even though it was a key element of
Benner's original cycle. No series of DJIA bear market lows could be
established based on 11-9-7 years, even though it was extensively
assessed.
Unexpectedly, a 11-10-7 year cycle of DJIA bear market lows fits much
more precisely (see Table 5). During the first half of the 20th century,
most important historic lows fall within this cycle - 1893,
1904, 1914, 1921, 1932, 1942 & 1949. The record for
the latter half of the century was not as good because the major bear
markets of 1974 and 1982 did not take place within the
cycle. The accuracy of the 11-10-7 year cycle was amazing as only
there was one notable exception - 1960, which was followed by a major
low in June 1962 some 18 months overdue. All other lows fell within the
cycle or or one or two months before or after. Those lows exactly within
the cycle occurred in the months April to August.
|
Table 5
11-10-7 YEAR CYCLE OF DJIA BEAR MARKET LOWS
|
|
Add
|
11-10-7 Year Cycle
|
US Event
|
DJIA
Bear Market Lows |
| |
1893 |
1893
Panic |
7/1893 |
| +
11 |
1904 |
1903-04
Crises |
11/1903
Two Months Early |
| +
10 |
1914 |
WW
1 |
7/1914 |
| +
7 |
1921 |
1920-21
Crises |
6/1921 |
| +
11 |
1932 |
Great
Depression |
7/1932 |
| +
10 |
1942 |
WW
11 |
4/1942 |
| +
7 |
1949 |
Recession |
6/1949 |
| +
11 |
1960
(a) |
Recession |
6/1962
18 Months Late |
| +
10 |
1970 |
Recession |
6/1970 |
| +
7 |
1977 |
No
Event |
2/1978
Two Months Late |
| +
11 |
1988 |
1987
Panic |
12/1987 One
Month Early |
| +
10 |
1998 |
1997-98
Crises |
8/1998 (b) |
| +
7 |
2005 |
No
event |
No Bear Market
Low |
|
(a) 10/1960 was the low of a
17.4% correction market, which commenced in 1/1960.
(b) This was a near bear market low, as a drop of 19.6% was
recorded. (A bear market is commonly defined as a 20% market
fall.)
|
Why
this 11-10-7 year cycle is so important remains unknown, although 28
multiplied by two gives 56 a key number in cycle theory.
Carolan's
16-20 Year Cycles
Chris
Carolan found four 36 year sub-cycles persisted in US market trends
during the 20th century as follows:
| 1901 |
1917 |
1910 |
1930 |
| +
36 |
+
36 |
+
36 |
+
36 |
| 1937 |
1953 |
1946 |
1966 |
| +
36 |
+
36 |
+
36 |
+
36 |
| 1973 |
1989 |
1982 |
2002 |
These
four 36 year cycles were presented in terms of two series of 16-20 year
cycles, based on the timing of major market turns or financial panics.
The interval between these two series is 29 years or one Inex eclipse
cycle (David
McMinn). Most of these years fall in the 9/56 year cycle patterns as
shown in Table C Appendix
1 - only the exceptions being 1953 and 1989
| |
|
|
|
1910 |
Nov 19, 1909
DJIA High |
| |
1901 |
May 9 US Panic |
+ 20 |
1930 |
Sep 03, 1929 DJIA
High |
| + 16 |
1917 |
Dec 19 DJIA
Low |
+ 16 |
1946 |
May 29
DJIA Peak |
| + 20 |
1937 |
Mar 10 DJIA
Peak |
+ 20 |
1966 |
Feb 9
DJIA Peak |
| + 16 |
1953 |
No Major Market Turn |
+ 16 |
1982 |
Aug 12 DJIA
Low |
| + 20 |
1973 |
Jan 11 DJIA
Peak |
+20 |
2002 |
Oct 9
DJIA Low |
| + 16 |
1989 |
Oct 13 Near
Panic |
|
|
|
Fibonacci Numbers & Market Activity
The Fibonacci numbers, based
on the tropical year, have been linked by various sources to financial
activity. For example, beginning with the secular low of 1877:
| |
1877 - 1877 Secular Low |
| + 55 |
1932 - 8/1932 Secular Low |
| + 34 |
1966 - 2/1966 Secular High |
| + 21 |
1987 - 8/1987 High |
| + 13 |
2000 - 1/2000 Secular High |
| + 8 |
2008 - ???? |
| 1932 - 7/1932 Low |
+ 34 |
1966 - 2/1966 High |
+ 34 |
2000 - 1/200 High |
|
+ 21 x 2
|
|
+ 21
|
|
-
|
| 1974 - 12/1974 Low |
+ 13 |
1987 - 12/1987 High |
+ 13 |
2000 - 1/2000 High |
| |
1966 - 10/1966
Low |
| + 8 |
1974 - 12/1974 Low |
| + 8 |
1982 - 8/1982 Low |
| + 8 |
1990 - 10/1990 Low |
| + 8 |
1998 - 8/1998 Low |
| + 8 |
2006 - ???? |
Adding Fibonacci numbers to the high of September 1929 (Sq 01) produced a
reasonably accurate trend of DJIA Highs/Lows through to 1942 with
declining accuracy after that.
| Sq 01 -
9/1929 High |
+ 3 |
1932 - 7/1932 Low |
| 1929 |
+ 5 |
1934 - 7/1934 Low |
| 1929 |
+ 8 |
1937 - 3/1937 High |
| 1929 |
+ 13 |
1942 - 4/1942 Low |
| 1929 |
+ 21 |
1950 - 6/1949 Low 7 months early |
| 1929 |
+ 34 |
1963 - 6/1962 Low 7 months
early |
| 1929 |
+ 55 |
1984 - 8/1982 Low 20 months early. |
However, something similar could not be repeated for
the August 1987 record high (Sq 03).
| Sq 03 - 8/1987
High |
+ 2 |
1989 - No DJIA High/Low |
| 1987 |
+ 3 |
1990 - 7/1990 High & 10/1990 Low |
| 1987 |
+ 5 |
1992 - No DJIA High/Low |
| 1987 |
+ 8 |
1995 - No DJIA High/Low |
| 1987 |
+ 13 |
2000 - 1/2000 High |
The secular high of 1966 produced better
results.
| Sq 03 -
10/1966 High |
+ 3 |
1969 - 12/1968 High -
One Month Early |
| 1966 |
+ 5 |
1971 - 6/1970
Low - 7 Months early |
| 1966 |
+ 8 |
1974 - 12/1974
Low |
| 1966 |
+ 13 |
1979 - 2/1980 High - 2
Months Late |
| 1966 |
+ 21 |
1987 -
8/1987 High |
| 1966 |
+ 34 |
2000 - 1/2000 High |
Walter E White, in his Elliott Wave
Principle (1968), believed that "the next important low may be in
1970". This correct forecast was derived by using Fibonacci numbers.
| 6/1949 Low |
1949 |
+ 21 |
1970 |
| 10/1957
Low |
1957 |
+ 13 |
1970 |
| 6/1962
Low |
1962 |
+ 8 |
1970 |
| 2/1966
High |
1965 |
+ 5 |
1970 |
Prechter (2000) predicted a bear market low for 2003-2004, based
on various technical forecasting techniques, including the Fibonacci
numbers. The following has been derived from his work with only one year
that was clearly amiss - 1995 which produced no major market turns. The
10/2002 market low was the nadir of the 2000-02 bear market and thus be a little
earlier than forecasted.
| 1857
Secular
Low - 14 months early |
1859 |
+ 144 |
2003 |
| 07/1914
Low |
1914 |
+ 89 |
2003 |
| 6/1949
Low - 6 Months Late |
1948 |
+ 55 |
2003 |
| 6/1970
Low - 6 Months Late |
1969 |
+ 34 |
2003 |
| 8/1982
Low |
1982 |
+ 21 |
2003 |
| 10/1990
Low |
1990 |
+ 13 |
2003 |
| No High/Low |
1995 |
+ 8 |
2003 |
| 8/1998
Near Bear Market Low |
1998 |
+ 5 |
2003 |
| 01/2000
Record DJIA High |
2000 |
+ 3 |
2003 |
These findings on the Fibonacci
numbers are certainly interesting, but they can be justifiably criticised. Such
market patterns may arise by selecting the data that
confirms the Fibonacci hypothesis. Contrary examples, which do not fit,
have been simply ignored.
Causal Mechanisms
According to Benner, "the cause producing the periodicity and
length of these cycles may be found in our solar system". "It
may be a meteorological fact that Jupiter is the ruling element in our
price cycles of natural productions; while also it may be suggested that
Saturn exerts an influence regulating the cycles in manufacture and
trade". Additionally, Uranus and Neptune "may send
forth an electric influence affecting Jupiter, Saturn and, in turn, the
Earth". "When certain combinations are ascertained which
produce one legitimate invariable manifestation from an analysis of the
operations of the combined solar system, we may be enabled to discover
the cause producing our price cycles, and the length of their duration. Benner
never fully explained the basis of his cycle, but he did make a
connection through the weather and climate, suggesting he was aware of
the earlier work on sunspots by Jevons, Herschel and others.
The
Sun, The Moon & The Number 56
showed that the 9/56 year panic cycle arises from cycles of the Moon and
Sun. Given the links between the Benner and the 9/56 year cycles, it could
be reasonably postulated that both are based on lunisolar cycles. Hard
evidence of a sunspot or planetary influence in financial markets has
failed to be established, despite a tremendous level of research. Thus, Benner's
view of sunspots and/or planets influencing the timing of his cycles
cannot be supported.
The
11-9-7 Year Cycle of market troughs was not mentioned in tA J
Frost's assessment on market cycles, although it was a key
component of the Benner Cycle. It may be more than a
coincidence that 7, 11 and 18 are all Lucas numbers. These are similar
to the Fibonacci numbers except they commence with 1, 3 instead of 1, 1
as for the Fibonacci numbers. The Lucas series is as follows:
1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123,
199...............
These
numbers have been linked to lunisolar cycles (McMinn, 2004). Additionally, Benner's
cycles of 16-18-20 and 11-9-7 can be broken down into various eclipse
cycles of the 7 year Tzolkinex, 9 Year Half Saros and 11 Year Tritos.
The 8-9-10 year cycle of market highs is much more difficult to explain
in terms of know eclipse cycles.
Conclusions
The 8-9-10 year and the 16-18-20 year cycles are based on the interval of
9 years and
its regular deviations. This is quite amazing as they have been so
relevant in stock market trends during the 20th century. The
three 54 year cycles, proposed by both Benner and
Frost,
may be directly linked to the 9/56
year panic cycle (see
Tables A & B, Appendix 1).
As noted by David McMinn (2004), the
9/56 year cycle only
correlated with the timing of financial crises. Something similar could not
be confirmed for the timing of peaks and troughs in financial activity. Thus
these findings on the 8-9-10 year cycle are very
interesting, as they may provide clues on the timing of peaks and troughs in
financial markets. If the Benner - Fibonacci cycle holds up to critical assessment,
it may offer theoretical
support for the use of these numbers in financial forecasting.
It
is debatable whether the Fibonacci numbers can be found in markets
patterns, as suggested in this paper. This work can be criticised for two reasons:
* The findings are presented selectively and thus are heavily biased.
Those series that do not support the Fibonacci hypothesis are ignored. Thus,
the Fibonacci series could arise by coincidence
alone and thus may not have any true relevance in market trends.
* Both highs and lows may appear in a given series, but no
explanation can be offered as to why this is so. One could reasonably expect a
series to consist of all highs or all lows. Why the peaks and troughs are
interchangeable in a particular series cannot be accounted for.
Whether Fibonacci numbers are actually valid in market trends is
debatable and more research is required before any firm answer may be
given.
It
remains to be seen how
accurately these 8-9-10 and 16-18-20 year cycles will predict trends into the 21st century. The
9/56 year cycle and presumably the Benner Cycle must
change over very
long time frames rather remaining fixed. Furthermore, the business cycle has profoundly
altered since World War II (Zarnowitz, 1992), with
much longer growth periods and brief shallow recessions. With the abandonment
of the gold standard in the 1930's, the US Government has been able to
increase money supply continuously over the past 65 years. This has resulted in
almost perpetual inflation and altered the periodicity of
recessions, which now occur as rare events. A looming financial crisis is
also now countered by lowering
interest rates and flooding the financial system with money. Even
so, the
Benner Cycles of 8-9-10 and 16-18-20 years remain of great interest, especially
given Dewey's comments on their forecasting accuracy.
Copyright.
©
2003.
David McMinn. All rights reserved.
References
Benner,
S. Benner's Prophecies of Future Ups & Downs in Prices.
Robert Clark Co.1875.
McMinn, David. Market Timing By The Number 56. Twin Palms Publishing.
2002. Revised 2004.
Mogey, Richard. The Mystery of the Forecast of an
Earlier Generation. Cycles. p 199-202. July - August 1991.
Prechter, Robert. A Major Stock Market Low Is Still Due in
2003-2004. The Elliott Wave Theorist. July 2000.
Prechter, Robert & Frost A J. Elliott Wave
Principle: Key to Stock Market Profits. New Classics Library. 1978.
Tsing.com Elliott Wave Principle. www.tsing.com/theory/lesson25.htm
Zarnowitz,
Victor. Business Cycles: Theory, History, Indicators and
Forecasting. The University of Chicago Press. 1992.
|